Theoretical Perspectives on Democratic Civil Military Relations
Keywords:
Elite, Democracy, Corporatism, Professionalism, Pakistan, Judiciary, InstitutionsAbstract
The nature of civil-military interactions is a critical factor in determining the success of any democracy. If civilian leadership is able to maintain its supremacy over the decision-making process, democracy will flourish. On the other hand, if military leaders are able to establish a garrison state and begin dominating the decision-making process, democratic structures will be weakened, and the likelihood of military rule or dictatorship will increase. This is evident from the situation in Pakistan. Various academics have presented a variety of theoretical ideas in order to maintain a healthy democratic connection between the military and the civilian population. Classical and modern thinkers disagree on a number of issues, but they are in agreement on one significant point: the military forces need to become more professional, and there is a great need to make sure that the military does not develop corporate interests.
Downloads
References
Burk, J. (2002). Theories of Civil-Military Relations, Vol. 29, Armed Forces and Society, Vo. 29, No. 1
Huntington S. P. (1981). Soldier and the State (London: Harvard University Press)
Finer S. E. (1976). Man on the Horseback: The Role of Military in the Politics (Harmondosworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1976)
Abrahamson B (1972). Military Professionalism and Political Power (Bevery Hills: Sage Publications)
Janowitz (1971). The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait (Newport: Macmillan Publishing Co., inc.)
Nordlinger.E. (1971) Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments (NJ: Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs)
Moskowitz. J (1997). Involvement in Politics: A Content Analysis of Civilian and Military Journals in Pakistan, France and Israel, p.14, cited in Kotera M Bhimaya, Civil-Military Relations: A Comparative study of India and Pakistan (Dissertation Published by RAND Graduate School)
Feaver P. D. (1998). Crisis as Shirking: An Agency Theory Evolution of the Sourcing of American Civil-Military Relations, Vol. 24
Schiff (1995). Civil Military Relations Reconsidered: A Theory of Concordance, Armed ForcesandSociety, Vol. 22, n. 1
Bland D (2004). A Unified Theory of Civil Military Relations, Armed Forces and Society, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 7-26