Relationship Between Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviours and Job Outcomes

Relationship Between Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviours and Job Outcomes

Authors

  • Aahana Saha

Keywords:

job satisfaction, work engagement, family support supervisor behaviour, turnover intention, teachers

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the connection between family-supportive supervisor behaviours (FSSB) and many work-related outcomes, such as job satisfaction, intention to leave, and interest in one's work. The study will use previously validated measures to evaluate FSSB, job satisfaction, turnover intention, and employee engagement. The associations between the variables will be analyzed using correlation and possible predictors and outcomes will be identified.

The results of this study should add to the current literature by offering empirical evidence for the link between FSSB and occupational outcomes. The hypothesis here is that FSSBs will lead to happier workers who are more invested in their jobs and less likely to leave them. Overall, this study aims to provide light on the significance of family supportive supervisor behaviours in fostering pleasant work environments and employee well-being by providing light on the association between FSSBs and job outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Casper, W. J., Martin, J. A., Buffardi, L. C., Erdwins, C. J., & O'Connell, K. M. (2018). Family-supportive supervision and employee job satisfaction: The mediating effects of work-family conflict and enrichment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(1), 35-48.

Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & King, E. B. (2017). The role of supportive work-family practices in the relationships between work-family culture and employee well-being. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(2), 125-142.

Wayne, J. H., Casper, W. J., Matthews, R. A., & Allen, T. D. (2017). Family-supportive organization perceptions, multiple dimensions of work-family conflict, and employee satisfaction: A test of model across five samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 183-197.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.

Gong, Y., Cheung, S. Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J. C. (2018). Unpacking the link between transformational leadership and employee creativity: The role of psychological empowerment and work engagement. Journal of Business Research, 88, 352-360.

Halbesleben, J. R., & Buckley, M. R. (2004). Burnout in organizational life. Journal of Management, 30(6), 859-879.

Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652.

Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230-240.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285.

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.

Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513.

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.

Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217-

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285.

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.

Matthews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Shockley, K. M. (2016). Workplace social support in a cross-cultural context: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(2), 137-152.

Nilsen, M. C., Holman, D., & Erickson, A. (2018). Linking family-supportive supervisor behavior and work engagement: The mediating role of organizational family-friendly policies and practices. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 107-117.

Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2017). Work–family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 268-283.

Chen, Y. H., Tsai, Y. M., & Chen, C. Y. (2013). The relationship between organizational climate, job stress, workplace burnout, and retention in a sample of Taiwanese nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1-13.

Additional Files

Published

20-05-2023

How to Cite

Aahana Saha. (2023). Relationship Between Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviours and Job Outcomes. Vidhyayana - An International Multidisciplinary Peer-Reviewed E-Journal - ISSN 2454-8596, 8(si6), 289–305. Retrieved from https://vidhyayanaejournal.org/journal/article/view/730
Loading...