Young Charlotte: Deciphering the Basics of American Balladry through ‘Reverse Folklore’

Young Charlotte: Deciphering the Basics of American Balladry through ‘Reverse Folklore’

Authors

  • Dr. Yug Joshi

Abstract

This investigation delves into the universally accepted criteria that folklorists employ to distinguish authentic folk literature from similar, yet non-authentic, materials. These criteria have been established through rigorous fieldwork and studies in the discipline of folklore, transcending boundaries of culture, language, geographical context, and historical periods. A few key characteristics of authentic folk literature include oral transmission, existence of multiple versions, and the anonymity of the author or creator. A defining feature is the collective authorship attributed to a group rather than an individual. This collective authorship not only differentiates folk literature from classical literature but also ensures an honest and accurate representation of the incidents narrated within the folklore. The paper presents an in-depth analysis of an exceptional case - the poem ‘Young Charlotte’. Originally authored by an individual and published in a newspaper, ‘Young Charlotte’ was subsequently embraced as part of American folk literature. The poem has since evolved into a ballad with over two hundred distinct versions disseminated across America. The study illuminates the unique journey of ‘Young Charlotte’, tracing its transformation from a single-authored newspaper poem to a widely recognized folksong within American folk literature. It further discusses the various adaptations and variations that the ballad has undergone as it traversed different times and places, thereby reflecting the dynamic nature of folk literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• Barry, Phillips. Native Balladry in America. 1909.

• Barry, Phillips. “William Carter, the Bensontown Homer.” The Journal of American Folklore, vol. 25, no. 96, 1912, pp. 156–68.

• Belden, H. M. “Balladry in America.” The Journal of American Folklore, vol. 25, no. 95, 1912, pp. 1–23.

• Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of Folklore Mythology and Legend: A-1. Volume One. 1949.

• Guigné, Anna Kearney. “Frozen Charlotte (Young Charlotte).” The Forgotten Songs of the Newfoundland Outports: As Taken from Kenneth Peacock’s Newfoundland Field Collection, 1951–1961, edited by Evelyn Osborne, University of Ottawa Press, 2016, pp. 136–38.

• Johnson, Sally. “A Legacy of Music Helen Hartness Flanders Preserved Vermont’s Folk Music Traditions.” Vermont Life, vol. 45, 03, season-01 1991, p. 16 to 20. Archive, archive.org/details/rbmsbk_ap2-v4_1991_V45N3/page/n1/mode/2up.

• Leach, Maria. The Rainbow Book of American Folk Tales and Legends. 1st ed., Cleveland, Ohio, World Pub. Co, 1958.

• Lord, Ernest. “Young Charlotte (or Fair Charlotte).” DigitalCommons@UMaine, digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/songstorysamplercollection/28.

• Lord, Ernest. 1966. “Young Charlotte.” NA66.10, CD113.4. Northeast Archives of Folklore and Oral History, Raymond H. Fogler Special Collections Department, University of Maine

• Perrow, E. C. “Songs and Rhymes from the South.” The Journal of American Folklore, vol. 25, no. 96, 1912, pp. 137–55.

• “Young Charlotte.” The Minnesota Heritage Songbook, 29 May 2013, mnheritagesongbook.net/the-songs/addition-song-with-recordings/young-charlotte.

Additional Files

Published

10-08-2023

How to Cite

Dr. Yug Joshi. (2023). Young Charlotte: Deciphering the Basics of American Balladry through ‘Reverse Folklore’. Vidhyayana - An International Multidisciplinary Peer-Reviewed E-Journal - ISSN 2454-8596, 9(1). Retrieved from http://vidhyayanaejournal.org/journal/article/view/975
Loading...